נק' מוניטין:
62,133
מספיק שתריץ חיפוש בגוגל ותמצא די הרבה.
הנה דוגמא
http://www.unm.edu/~lkravitz/Article folder/bonemass.html
מה שלא סביר שתמצא זה התחשבות ברמת המתאמן.
הנה דוגמא
http://www.unm.edu/~lkravitz/Article folder/bonemass.html
מה שלא סביר שתמצא זה התחשבות ברמת המתאמן.
נק' מוניטין:
31
הדברים הטובים ביותר עולים כסף אז זה מה שהיה בחיפושון...
ואין לי מושג למה לעזאזל חוקרים רק נשים. 😣
זה בקשר לריצה
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1724580&blobtype=pdf
זה לאימוני משקולות
http://article.pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/RPAS/rpv?hm=HInit&afpf=y96-099.pdf&journal=cjpp&volume=74
http://www.jbmronline.org/doi/pdf/10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.2.255
http://www.jbmronline.org/doi/pdf/10.1359/JBMR.0301222
Kerr D, Morton A, Dick I, Prince R.
Department of Medicine, University of Western Australia.
It is considered that skeletal mass in humans may respond to loading or the number of loading cycles. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of a 1 year progressive resistance training program on the bone mass of 56 postmenopausal women. Assignment was by block randomization to one of two resistance training groups: a strength trained group (3 x 8 repetition maximum) or an endurance group (3 x 20 repetition maximum). The resistance exercises were selected to stress the ipsilateral forearm and hip region. The exercising side was randomly assigned with one side exercised while the alternate side acted as the nonexercise control. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured every 3 months at the radial forearm and four hip sites using the Hologic QDR 2000 bone densitometer. A linear regression function was fitted for each individual's bone density results, and the slope was compared for the exercise and control side using paired t-tests. The bone mass increase with the strength regimen was significantly greater at the trochanteric hip site (control -0.6 +/- 2.2%, exercise 1.7 +/- 4.1%, p < 0.01), at the intertrochanteric hip site (control -0.1 +/- 2.1%, exercise 1.5 +/- 3.0%, p < 0.05), Ward's triangle (control 0.8 +/- 5.2%, exercise 2.3 +/- 4.0%, p < 0.05), and at the ultradistal radial site (control -1.4 +/- 2.3%, exercise 2.4 +/- 4.3%, p < 0.01). There was no significant increase in BMD with the endurance regimen except at the radius midsite (control -1.0 +/- 2.3%, exercise 0.1 +/- 1.4%, p < 0.01). In both the endurance and the strength group, muscle strength, tested by a one-repetition maximum (1RM) test, increased significantly for all 10 exercises (p < 0.01) and to a similar degree in the two groups. In the strength group but not the endurance group there were significant correlations between the slope of the change in BMD and the percentage increase in strength as follows: trochanter with leg press; intertrochanter with leg press (p < 0.05); and Ward's triangle with hip extension and hip adduction (p < 0.05). Thus these results support the notion of a site-specific response of bone to maximal loading from resistance exercise in that although the trochanter and intertrochanter bone density was elevated by the resistance exercises undertaken, there was no effect on the femoral neck value. Postmenopausal bone mass can be significantly increased by a strength regimen that uses high-load low repetitions but not by an endurance regimen that uses low-load high repetitions. We conclude that the peak load is more important than the number of loading cycles in increasing bone mass in early postmenopausal women.
Snow-Harter C, Bouxsein ML, Lewis BT, Carter DR, Marcus R.
Musculoskeletal Research Laboratory, GRECC, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Palo Alto, California.
A substantial body of cross-sectional data and a smaller number of intervention trials generally justify optimism that regular physical activity benefits the skeleton. We conducted an 8 month controlled exercise trial in a group of healthy college women (mean age = 19.9 years) who were randomly assigned to a control group or to progressive training in jogging or weight lifting. We measured the following variables: bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine (L2-4) and right proximal femur using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, dynamic muscle strength using the 1-RM method, and endurance performance using the 1.5 mile walk/run field test. A total of 31 women completed the 8 month study. For women completing the study, compliance, defined as the percentage of workout sessions attended, was 97% for the runners (range 90-100%) and 92% (range 88-100%) for the weight trainers. Body weight increased by approximately 2 kg in all groups (p less than 0.05). Weight training was associated with significant increases (p less than 0.01) in muscle strength in all muscle groups. Improvement ranged from 10% for the deep back to 54% for the leg. No significant changes in strength scores were observed in the control or running groups. Aerobic performance improved only in the running group (16%, p less than 0.01). Lumbar BMD increased (p less than 0.05) in both runners (1.3 +/- 1.6%) and weight trainers (1.2 +/- 1.8%). These results did not differ from each other but were both significantly greater than results in control subjects, in whom bone mineral did not change.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
The effects of progressive resistance training on bone density: a review. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 25-30, 1999. Osteoporosis is a major public health problem that is characterized by low bone mass and increased susceptibility to fractures, primarily of the hip, spine, and wrist. It is estimated to cause 1.5 million fractures annually in the United States in people aged 50 yr and older. Physical activity, particularly weight-bearing exercise, is thought to provide the mechanical stimuli or "loading" important for the maintenance and improvement of bone health, whereas physical inactivity has been implicated in bone loss and its associated health costs. Both aerobic and resistance training exercise can provide weight-bearing stimulus to bone, yet research indicates that resistance training may have a more profound site specific effect than aerobic exercise. Over the past 10 years, nearly two dozen cross-sectional and longitudinal studies have shown a direct and positive relationship between the effects of resistance training and bone density. Conversely, a handful of other studies have reported little or no effect on bone density. However, these results may be partially attributable to the study design, intensity and duration of the exercise protocol, and the bone density measurement techniques used. High-intensity resistance training, in contrast to traditional pharmacological and nutritional approaches for improving bone health in older adults, has the added benefit of influencing multiple risk factors for osteoporosis including improved strength and balance and increased muscle mass.
A decrease in physical activity may lead to an increased loss of bone and an increase in the incidence of osteoporotic fractures. Studies have demonstrated increases in bone formation in animals and increases in bone mineral density in humans. Studies of animals show that bone has enhanced physical and mechanical properties following periods of increased stress. Strains which are high in rate and magnitude, and of abnormal distribution, but not necessarily long in duration, are best for inducing new bone formation, resulting in the strengthening of bone by increased density. Cross-sectional studies show that athletes, especially those who are strength-trained, have greater bone mineral densities than nonathletes, and that strength, muscle mass and maximal oxygen uptake correlate with bone density. Longitudinal training studies indicate that strength training and high impact endurance training increase bone density. Strain induction, the deformation that occurs in bone under loading, may cause a greater level of formation and an inhibition of resorption within the normal remodelling cycle of bone, or it may cause direct activation of osteoblastic bone formation from the quiescent state. Various mechanisms have been proposed for the transformation of mechanical strain into biochemical stimuli to enhance bone formation. These include prostaglandin release, piezoelectric and streaming potentials, increased bone blood flow, microdamage and hormonally mediated mechanisms. These mechanisms may act on their own or in concert, depending on the loading situation and the characteristics of the bone.
ואין לי מושג למה לעזאזל חוקרים רק נשים. 😣
זה בקשר לריצה
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=1724580&blobtype=pdf
זה לאימוני משקולות
http://article.pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/RPAS/rpv?hm=HInit&afpf=y96-099.pdf&journal=cjpp&volume=74
http://www.jbmronline.org/doi/pdf/10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.2.255
http://www.jbmronline.org/doi/pdf/10.1359/JBMR.0301222
Kerr D, Morton A, Dick I, Prince R.
Department of Medicine, University of Western Australia.
It is considered that skeletal mass in humans may respond to loading or the number of loading cycles. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of a 1 year progressive resistance training program on the bone mass of 56 postmenopausal women. Assignment was by block randomization to one of two resistance training groups: a strength trained group (3 x 8 repetition maximum) or an endurance group (3 x 20 repetition maximum). The resistance exercises were selected to stress the ipsilateral forearm and hip region. The exercising side was randomly assigned with one side exercised while the alternate side acted as the nonexercise control. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured every 3 months at the radial forearm and four hip sites using the Hologic QDR 2000 bone densitometer. A linear regression function was fitted for each individual's bone density results, and the slope was compared for the exercise and control side using paired t-tests. The bone mass increase with the strength regimen was significantly greater at the trochanteric hip site (control -0.6 +/- 2.2%, exercise 1.7 +/- 4.1%, p < 0.01), at the intertrochanteric hip site (control -0.1 +/- 2.1%, exercise 1.5 +/- 3.0%, p < 0.05), Ward's triangle (control 0.8 +/- 5.2%, exercise 2.3 +/- 4.0%, p < 0.05), and at the ultradistal radial site (control -1.4 +/- 2.3%, exercise 2.4 +/- 4.3%, p < 0.01). There was no significant increase in BMD with the endurance regimen except at the radius midsite (control -1.0 +/- 2.3%, exercise 0.1 +/- 1.4%, p < 0.01). In both the endurance and the strength group, muscle strength, tested by a one-repetition maximum (1RM) test, increased significantly for all 10 exercises (p < 0.01) and to a similar degree in the two groups. In the strength group but not the endurance group there were significant correlations between the slope of the change in BMD and the percentage increase in strength as follows: trochanter with leg press; intertrochanter with leg press (p < 0.05); and Ward's triangle with hip extension and hip adduction (p < 0.05). Thus these results support the notion of a site-specific response of bone to maximal loading from resistance exercise in that although the trochanter and intertrochanter bone density was elevated by the resistance exercises undertaken, there was no effect on the femoral neck value. Postmenopausal bone mass can be significantly increased by a strength regimen that uses high-load low repetitions but not by an endurance regimen that uses low-load high repetitions. We conclude that the peak load is more important than the number of loading cycles in increasing bone mass in early postmenopausal women.
Snow-Harter C, Bouxsein ML, Lewis BT, Carter DR, Marcus R.
Musculoskeletal Research Laboratory, GRECC, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Palo Alto, California.
A substantial body of cross-sectional data and a smaller number of intervention trials generally justify optimism that regular physical activity benefits the skeleton. We conducted an 8 month controlled exercise trial in a group of healthy college women (mean age = 19.9 years) who were randomly assigned to a control group or to progressive training in jogging or weight lifting. We measured the following variables: bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine (L2-4) and right proximal femur using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, dynamic muscle strength using the 1-RM method, and endurance performance using the 1.5 mile walk/run field test. A total of 31 women completed the 8 month study. For women completing the study, compliance, defined as the percentage of workout sessions attended, was 97% for the runners (range 90-100%) and 92% (range 88-100%) for the weight trainers. Body weight increased by approximately 2 kg in all groups (p less than 0.05). Weight training was associated with significant increases (p less than 0.01) in muscle strength in all muscle groups. Improvement ranged from 10% for the deep back to 54% for the leg. No significant changes in strength scores were observed in the control or running groups. Aerobic performance improved only in the running group (16%, p less than 0.01). Lumbar BMD increased (p less than 0.05) in both runners (1.3 +/- 1.6%) and weight trainers (1.2 +/- 1.8%). These results did not differ from each other but were both significantly greater than results in control subjects, in whom bone mineral did not change.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
The effects of progressive resistance training on bone density: a review. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 25-30, 1999. Osteoporosis is a major public health problem that is characterized by low bone mass and increased susceptibility to fractures, primarily of the hip, spine, and wrist. It is estimated to cause 1.5 million fractures annually in the United States in people aged 50 yr and older. Physical activity, particularly weight-bearing exercise, is thought to provide the mechanical stimuli or "loading" important for the maintenance and improvement of bone health, whereas physical inactivity has been implicated in bone loss and its associated health costs. Both aerobic and resistance training exercise can provide weight-bearing stimulus to bone, yet research indicates that resistance training may have a more profound site specific effect than aerobic exercise. Over the past 10 years, nearly two dozen cross-sectional and longitudinal studies have shown a direct and positive relationship between the effects of resistance training and bone density. Conversely, a handful of other studies have reported little or no effect on bone density. However, these results may be partially attributable to the study design, intensity and duration of the exercise protocol, and the bone density measurement techniques used. High-intensity resistance training, in contrast to traditional pharmacological and nutritional approaches for improving bone health in older adults, has the added benefit of influencing multiple risk factors for osteoporosis including improved strength and balance and increased muscle mass.
A decrease in physical activity may lead to an increased loss of bone and an increase in the incidence of osteoporotic fractures. Studies have demonstrated increases in bone formation in animals and increases in bone mineral density in humans. Studies of animals show that bone has enhanced physical and mechanical properties following periods of increased stress. Strains which are high in rate and magnitude, and of abnormal distribution, but not necessarily long in duration, are best for inducing new bone formation, resulting in the strengthening of bone by increased density. Cross-sectional studies show that athletes, especially those who are strength-trained, have greater bone mineral densities than nonathletes, and that strength, muscle mass and maximal oxygen uptake correlate with bone density. Longitudinal training studies indicate that strength training and high impact endurance training increase bone density. Strain induction, the deformation that occurs in bone under loading, may cause a greater level of formation and an inhibition of resorption within the normal remodelling cycle of bone, or it may cause direct activation of osteoblastic bone formation from the quiescent state. Various mechanisms have been proposed for the transformation of mechanical strain into biochemical stimuli to enhance bone formation. These include prostaglandin release, piezoelectric and streaming potentials, increased bone blood flow, microdamage and hormonally mediated mechanisms. These mechanisms may act on their own or in concert, depending on the loading situation and the characteristics of the bone.
נק' מוניטין:
6,632
במקרה הזה השמנות מרוויחות 🤡
