מבולבלת....מה לעשות?

[coldfire]

אגב בין אם כן או לא, סתם לידע כללי..״נשים״ הן רבות ו-״חיה״ היא יחידה יש כאן בעיה לשונית you see?

תתאבד.

 

[Rogue]

תתאבד.

מפחד מידי להשאיר את העולם בידיים של אנשים כמוך.

 

[Rhino]

מפחד מידי להשאיר את העולם בידיים של אנשים כמוך.

נחון. אלכס, מתקנים אותך לשונית יא רוסי מפגר, מה הבעיה להגיד תודה ולסתום את הפה?

 

[coldfire]

נחון. אלכס, מתקנים אותך לשונית יא רוסי מפגר, מה הבעיה להגיד תודה ולסתום את הפה?

תתאבד. אתה סתם סוטה מהדיון הפורה.

 

[Rhino]

תתאבד. אתה סתם סוטה מהדיון הפורה.

מפחד מידי להשאיר את העולם בידיים של אנשים כמוך.

​

 

[coldfire]

מפחד מידי להשאיר את העולם בידיים של אנשים כמוך.

​

יש כאן בעיה של מקוריות, you see?

 

[Rhino]

יש כאן בעיה של מקוריות, you see?

סליחה אחי, לא ידעתי שמילים זה רכ1ש ):

 

[coldfire]

סליחה אחי, לא ידעתי שמילים זה רכ1ש ):

The bourgeoisie has through its exploitation of the world market given a cosmopolitan character to production and consumption in every country. To the great chagrin of Reactionists, it has drawn from under the feet of industry the national ground on which it stood. All old-established national industries have been destroyed or are daily being destroyed. They are dislodged by new industries, whose introduction becomes a life and death question for all civilised nations, by industries that no longer work up indigenous raw material, but raw material drawn from the remotest zones; industries whose products are consumed, not only at home, but in every quarter of the globe. In place of the old wants, satisfied by the production of the country, we find new wants, requiring for their satisfaction the products of distant lands and climes. In place of the old local and national seclusion and self-sufficiency, we have intercourse in every direction, universal inter-dependence of nations. And as in material, so also in intellectual production. The intellectual creations of individual nations become common property. National one-sidedness and narrowmindedness become more and more impossible, and from the numerous national and local literatures, there arises a world literature.

 

[Rhino]

אחי, איפה אני מוכר את החלק שלי ב intellectual creations של הכלל?

 

[coldfire]

אחי, איפה אני מוכר את החלק שלי ב intellectual creations של הכלל?

A similar movement is going on before our own eyes. Modern bourgeois society, with its relations of production, of exchange and of property, a society that has conjured up such gigantic means of production and of exchange, is like the sorcerer who is no longer able to control the powers of the nether world whom he has called up by his spells. For many a decade past the history of industry and commerce is but the history of the revolt of modern productive forces against modern conditions of production, against the property relations that are the conditions for the existence of the bourgeois and of its rule. It is enough to mention the commercial crises that by their periodical return put the existence of the entire bourgeois society on its trial, each time more threateningly. In these crises, a great part not only of the existing products, but also of the previously created productive forces, are periodically destroyed. In these crises, there breaks out an epidemic that, in all earlier epochs, would have seemed an absurdity – the epidemic of overproduction. Society suddenly finds itself put back into a state of momentary barbarism; it appears as if a famine, a universal war of devastation, had cut off the supply of every means of subsistence; industry and commerce seem to be destroyed; and why? Because there is too much civilisation, too much means of subsistence, too much industry, too much commerce. The productive forces at the disposal of society no longer tend to further the development of the conditions of bourgeois property; on the contrary, they have become too powerful for these conditions, by which they are fettered, and so soon as they overcome these fetters, they bring disorder into the whole of bourgeois society, endanger the existence of bourgeois property. The conditions of bourgeois society are too narrow to comprise the wealth created by them. And how does the bourgeoisie get over these crises? On the one hand by enforced destruction of a mass of productive forces; on the other, by the conquest of new markets, and by the more thorough exploitation of the old ones. That is to say, by paving the way for more extensive and more destructive crises, and by diminishing the means whereby crises are prevented.

 

[Rhino]

A similar movement is going on before our own eyes. Modern bourgeois society, with its relations of production, of exchange and of property, a society that has conjured up such gigantic means of production and of exchange, is like the sorcerer who is no longer able to control the powers of the nether world whom he has called up by his spells. For many a decade past the history of industry and commerce is but the history of the revolt of modern productive forces against modern conditions of production, against the property relations that are the conditions for the existence of the bourgeois and of its rule. It is enough to mention the commercial crises that by their periodical return put the existence of the entire bourgeois society on its trial, each time more threateningly. In these crises, a great part not only of the existing products, but also of the previously created productive forces, are periodically destroyed. In these crises, there breaks out an epidemic that, in all earlier epochs, would have seemed an absurdity – the epidemic of overproduction. Society suddenly finds itself put back into a state of momentary barbarism; it appears as if a famine, a universal war of devastation, had cut off the supply of every means of subsistence; industry and commerce seem to be destroyed; and why? Because there is too much civilisation, too much means of subsistence, too much industry, too much commerce. The productive forces at the disposal of society no longer tend to further the development of the conditions of bourgeois property; on the contrary, they have become too powerful for these conditions, by which they are fettered, and so soon as they overcome these fetters, they bring disorder into the whole of bourgeois society, endanger the existence of bourgeois property. The conditions of bourgeois society are too narrow to comprise the wealth created by them. And how does the bourgeoisie get over these crises? On the one hand by enforced destruction of a mass of productive forces; on the other, by the conquest of new markets, and by the more thorough exploitation of the old ones. That is to say, by paving the way for more extensive and more destructive crises, and by diminishing the means whereby crises are prevented.

אני מדמם מהעיניים, והדם שלי זה גם הרכוש שלך, בוא תיקח אותו.

 

[klubnichka4]

הי, לגבי מאמן, התוכנית אימונים ותזונה נבנתה על ידי מאמן

משפט כללי מידי ולא מדויק בכלל לאימון נשים.
יש המלצות שניתן לתת בפורום ויש כאלו שפשוט לא ניתן..צריך לעבוד עם המתאמן/מתאמנת ולהסיק מסקנות,
זו המלצה מהסוג שלא ניתן לתת בפורום,
״תות״ שקלת לקחת מאמן מהאיזור שלך שיעזור לך להיות בכיוון הנכון?

 

[oz25]

אלא אם כן הוא גם תזונאי(ואני בספק) -מאמן לא רשאי לבנות תכנית תזונה למתאמן.

הוא כן יכול לתת לך קו כללי מה לאכול אבל לא כמויות שיתאימו ספציפית לך כדי להוריד/להעלות במשקל.